Parking Mandate Reform Brings a Little Bit of Good for Everyone
This article was originally published, in slightly different form, on Parking Reform Network. It is shared here with permission. All pictures were supplied by the writer.
Anchorage. (Photo by Luke Jones.)
The day after a city repeals its mandatory parking minimums, it’s still the exact same city. Not a single parking space need be added or removed as a direct consequence of that simple policy change. For that reason, it’s vitally important for parking reformers to go back and actually document what happens in the months and years after mandates are removed. To observe what possibilities have been opened up that weren’t there before. Advocates in Anchorage, Alaska, are doing just that.
Anchorage ended its parking mandates citywide in November 2022, one of at least 79 American cities to have done so, at current count. (“City” is a stretch of a term here, since Anchorage has the largest municipal boundaries in the U.S. The nominal “city” of Anchorage includes vast wilderness areas and is home to 287,000 people — over 40% of Alaska’s population.)
The Sightline Institute documented the reforms as they happened. Parking reform in Anchorage was the subject of strong bipartisan agreement. The measure to end mandates won a unanimous 12-0 vote in the Anchorage Assembly (Anchorage’s version of a city council), and it was co-sponsored by a left-of-center optometrist and a right-of-center real estate broker. Even the city’s mayor, who had often found himself at odds with the Assembly, praised the move.
Parking reform in Anchorage was, in some ways, promoted and passed as the keystone of an ambitious pro-housing agenda that has continued to bear fruit. In the time since, Anchorage has also relaxed restrictions on “bonus” apartments (i.e. accessory dwelling units, or ADUs) on residential lots; created more flexibility for housing and neighborhood-serving retail downtown; and made small-scale apartments such as triplexes and fourplexes more viable by streamlining onerous rules that previously applied to such homes.
But parking reform is not just a housing issue. It’s so much more.
The bipartisan popularity of parking reform should be no surprise when you really look at what possibilities it unlocks. The thing cities see again and again when major parking reforms are implemented is that the wins are both diverse and plentiful.
A thread on Twitter/X in April from anonymous account AK_Urban documented some of those wins in Anchorage. Here are just a few of the things ending parking mandates can do for your city too:
Spur Development Where None Was Happening
Glacier City Center, a project in the ski community of Girdwood (which is outside Anchorage but within its municipal boundaries), cut its on-site parking from 40 to 14 spaces, reclaiming valuable land for additional commercial space. Prior to parking reform, only one new business had opened in Girdwood in a decade. Parking mandates were a key reason for this, Girdwood Supervisor Mike Edgington told the Sightline Institute.
Girdwood’s experience illustrates that parking requirements are a highly relevant barrier to development not only in dense urban contexts but often even more so in small towns. (By the way, Girdwood came around to supporting parking reform based on the successful experience of another resort community: Sandpoint, Idaho.)
Girdwood, Alaska. (Photo by Nathan Searles.)
Grant Crucial Flexibility to Small Businesses
A Mexican restaurant in Anchorage had seen its renovation plans stymied by an untenably expensive requirement to expand an already-underused parking lot to an enormous 99 spaces. The passage of parking reform made it possible for the restaurant to undertake a phased redevelopment plan.
A presentation slide from La Mex restaurant demonstrates the parking required under Anchorage’s previous mandates, now repealed.
Make Affordable Housing Possible
After parking reform, Anchorage’s Barratt Inn was able to be converted into permanent low-income housing, providing 96 badly needed affordable apartments and helping to address the city’s growing homelessness crisis. The reuse project would have been illegal under the prior parking requirement.
The redevelopment plan for the Barratt Inn as affordable housing includes reduced parking and added landscaping.
Make Missing-Middle Housing Possible
Multiple examples are cited of small infill condo and duplex projects that would have been illegal under the previous parking code. Legalizing these options makes it possible to add needed housing in established neighborhoods.
A duplex with a two-car garage under construction in Spenard, Anchorage. (Source: AK_Urban.)
Cut Back on Bureaucracy
The AK_Urban thread points out that a Costco store was able to alter its loading dock, removing several customer parking spaces, without having to receive permission from the planning department. This saves city staff time and money scrutinizing minor decisions that are best left to individual businesses.
Right-Size Parking Without Eliminating It
What is clear from the Anchorage examples documented is that builders are still providing parking. Alaska’s largest city is hardly New York or Chicago. Anchorage — and everywhere parking reform is enacted — make it possible for parking decisions to be made according to actual context and need, instead of conforming to an arbitrary and unproductive mandate.
Daniel Herriges has been a regular contributor to Strong Towns since 2015 and is a founding member of the Strong Towns movement. He is the co-author of Escaping the Housing Trap: The Strong Towns Response to the Housing Crisis, with Charles Marohn. Daniel now works as the Policy Director at the Parking Reform Network, an organization which seeks to accelerate the reform of harmful parking policies by educating the public about these policies and serving as a connecting hub for advocates and policy makers. Daniel’s work reflects a lifelong fascination with cities and how they work. When he’s not perusing maps (for work or pleasure), he can be found exploring out-of-the-way neighborhoods on foot or bicycle. Daniel has lived in Northern California and Southwest Florida, and he now resides back in his hometown of St. Paul, Minnesota, along with his wife and two children. Daniel has a Masters in Urban and Regional Planning from the University of Minnesota.